???? alsa-0.9.2 @ RedHat 9.0 ?

Dragonfly

[quote:7faf30d9fa="llc"]刚刚在redhat内核2.4.20-9的源码目录下查了一下,内核源码里有两个地方用到这个schedule_work函数,按道理应该支持才对
drivers/message/fusion/mptscsih.h:      if (schedule_work(x) == 0) {    \
drivers/message/fusion/mptlan.c:                        schedule_work(&priv->post_buckets_task);
include/linux/workqueue.h:extern int FASTCALL(schedule_work(struct work_struct *work));

不知道你现在用的内核是不是自己编译的?如果用的还是rh9原装自带的2.4.18-8,试试将kernel-source rpm包用--force参数覆盖安装一遍,然后重新make alsa驱动[/quote]

from u post, i can not find where linux kernel implement this schedule_work(). and again redhat hack the linux kernel and back port this from 2.5.x kernel. my vanillia 2.4.20 kernel does not have this. even doesnot have this waitqueue.h.

Dragonfly

[quote:4bcc612dd5="lbohr"]# ./configure --with-kernel=/usr/src/linux-2.4.20-8 --with-moddir=/lib/modules/2.4.20-8/kernel --with-sequencer=yes --with-cards=via82xx

checking for kernel module symbol versions... "yes"

＃make
proceeding....

Thank u[/quote]

en? how u manage to get this?

lbohr

in kernel src fold,as you said
make menuconfig
choose :enable all three options in load module support
save
make dep

but after make all,
modprobe snd-via82xx
the same problem:
/lib/modules/2.4.20-8/kernel/sound/acore/snd.o: unresolved symbol schedule_work
/lib/modules/2.4.20-8/kernel/sound/acore/snd.o: insmod /lib/modules/2.4.20-8/kernel/sound/acore/snd.o failed
/lib/modules/2.4.20-8/kernel/sound/acore/snd.o: insmod snd-via82xx failed

Dragonfly

[quote:22d4c22603="lbohr"]in kernel src fold,as you said
make menuconfig
choose :enable all three options in load module support
save
make dep

but after make all,
modprobe snd-via82xx
the same problem:
/lib/modules/2.4.20-8/kernel/sound/acore/snd.o: unresolved symbol schedule_work
/lib/modules/2.4.20-8/kernel/sound/acore/snd.o: insmod /lib/modules/2.4.20-8/kernel/sound/acore/snd.o failed
/lib/modules/2.4.20-8/kernel/sound/acore/snd.o: insmod snd-via82xx failed[/quote]

i do not have rh9 at hand. i will try it asap and tell u why. i use gentoo and use vanilla kernel, it is so easy to get it work. and my rh8 on another desktop does not give me such pain.

lbohr

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg07209.html
go back to 0.9.0rc6 for it to work properly

I try again with 0.9.6rc6,it work well
THanks

Dragonfly

i test the alsa 092 on my rh 8.0 , no any problem.
a last try is to recompile the kernel, boot with new kernel, and try to compile alsa again. u can try that if u want. i do not find rh 9 till now.

Dragonfly

i download a rh 9 kernel source on my rh8 and try to recompile it. it is a stupid kernel code. my customized config always fails in compilation. so u had better stay at 0.90 or download 0.92 rpm from freshrpm.net

lbohr

谢谢你，做了这么多工作，我就用0.9.0rc6，不重编译内核了。
//bow

Dragonfly

welcome. i just feel interested why my kernel works well while rh one has so many troubles.

llc

rh9的内核确实问题多多,我在rh8下编译可以通过的摄影头驱动在rh9的内核下就是不行,错误情况和楼主的差不多,自己胡乱修改了一下后,可以驱动了,但几乎功能尽失,拍出的画面惨不认睹

Dragonfly

i believe rh back port many linux 2.5.x patches to 2.4.20 while do not do enough test. so if u really want to use new functionalities, u can install a 2.5.66. that is stable enough.

lbohr

看来不得不重新编译内核了,
不过刚看到，没有NV支持2。5的驱动

lbohr

recompile kernel 2.4.20(tarball from www.kernel.org)
alsa-0.9.2 works now.
There are some bugs in kernel 2.4.20-8(RedHat 9.0)

Dragonfly

[quote:368ea77bb7="lbohr"]recompile kernel 2.4.20(tarball from www.kernel.org)
alsa-0.9.2 works now.
There are some bugs in kernel 2.4.20-8(RedHat 9.0)[/quote]
this is what i want to recommend.      

cnhnln

RH9,自己编译的2.4.20内核.从 www.kernel.org 下载的官方的内核,不是RH自带的源代码.SB live 5.1

换了多个不同版本的alsa的驱动,编译都不通过,包括公社前天提供的rc5.
[code:1]configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating version
config.status: creating Makefile.conf
config.status: creating snddevices
config.status: creating utils/alsa-driver.spec
config.status: creating utils/buildrpm
config.status: creating toplevel.config
config.status: creating include/config.h
config.status: creating include/config1.h
config.status: creating include/version.h
config.status: include/version.h is unchanged
[/code:1]